Prediction of Shana Claes vs Marlot Meddens Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
S. Claes vs M. Meddens

Shana Claes

BEL

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

293

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

$1.7K

Plays

Marlot Meddens

NED

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

293

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

$1.7K

Plays

Head-to-head: Claes 1 - 0 Meddens

They have played 2 sets in total, with Shana Claes winning 2 and Marlot Meddens winning 0. The last match between Shana Claes and Marlot Meddens was at the Alkmaar, 19-06-2006, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Shana Claes getting the victory 7-6(3) 6-4.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Claes	1
Meddens	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R1) Alkmaar(06-19-06)

Stats

Shana Claes

Marlot Meddens

S. Claes vs M. Meddens H2H Profile

S. Claes	Stats	M. Meddens
$0	Career Prize Money	$1,720
27.27% (9-24)	Career Total W/L	63.01% (92-54)
1	Clay	0
0	Titles	5
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

S. Claes vs M. Meddens Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Shana Claes has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Marlot Meddens has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Shana Claes, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Marlot Meddens has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Shana Claes has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Marlot Meddens has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Shana Claes has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Marlot Meddens winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Shana Claes has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 33% (W/L 2/4), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 14% (W/L 1/6). Marlot Meddens has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 33% (W/L 6/3), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 2/3).
Player level: In the last year, Shana Claes has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Marlot Meddens has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Shana Claes winning 1 times and Marlot Meddens being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Shana Claes winning 2 and Marlot Meddens winning 0.
The last match between Shana Claes and Marlot Meddens was at the Alkmaar, 19-06-2006, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Shana Claes getting the victory 7-6(3) 6-4.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Shana Claes has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Marlot Meddens has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Shana Claes has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Marlot Meddens has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Shana Claes has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Marlot Meddens has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Shana Claes vs Marlot Meddens Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

S. Claes vs M. Meddens H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

S. Claes	Stats	M. Meddens
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
13	Games Won	10
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

S. Claes Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Rebecq - 07-08-2006
R2 Sylvia MonteroS. Montero	L	4-6 6-3 6-2	Stats
R1 Anouk DelefortrieA. Delefortrie	W	6-2 6-1	Stats
Bad Saulgau - 31-07-2006
R1 Stefania BoffaS. Boffa	L	2-6 6-4 6-1	Stats
Brussels - 10-07-2006
R1 Mireia Gonzalez-BoschM. Gonzalez-Bosch	L	6-3 7-5	Stats
Heerhugowaard - 26-06-2006
R1 Jessie De VriesJ. De	L	6-0 1-0 ret.	Stats

View All

M. Meddens Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Wiesbaden - 03-05-2010
R2 Linda BerlineckeL. Berlinecke	L	6-3 6-4	Stats
R1 Felicitas KastnerF. Kastner	W	6-0 6-1	Stats
Bournemouth - 26-04-2010
R2 Romana Caroline TabakR. Caroline	L	6-4 7-5	Stats
R1 Nicola GeorgeN. George	W	6-3 6-3	Stats
Hvar - 05-04-2010
R2 Martina CaciottiM. Caciotti	L	2-6 7-5 7-5	Stats

View All

S. Claes vs M. Meddens Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

S. Claes	Stats	M. Meddens
27.27% (9/24)	YTD Win/Loss	63.01% (92/54)
31.94% (23/49)	Sets Win/Loss	61.96% (202/124)
42.81% (268/358)	Games Win/Loss	55.34% (1638/1322)
33.33% (2/4)	Hard Win/Loss	66.67% (6/3)
23.53% (4/13)	Clay Win/Loss	65.12% (84/45)
30.00% (3/7)	Indoor Hard W/L	25.00% (2/6)
0	Total Double Faults	3
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
368.94	Average Opponent Rank	504.47
0% (0/0)	1st Serve %	80% (122/152)
0% (0/0)	1st Serve Win %	48% (58/122)
0% (0/0)	2nd Serve Win %	43% (13/30)
0% (0/0)	Break Points Won % (Total)	40% (10/25)
0% (0/0)	Return Points Win %	49% (81/167)
0.00% (0/1)	Main Tour W/L	40.00% (2/3)
0.00% (0/2)	Challenger W/L	34.38% (11/21)
30.00% (9/21)	Futures W/L	72.48% (79/30)
27% (9/33)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	63% (92/145)
80% (4/5)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	65% (15/23)
17% (1/6)	Deciding Set Win %	49% (17/35)
67% (12/8)	1st Set Won, Won Match	86% (94/81)
33% (12/4)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	14% (94/13)
5% (21/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	21% (52/11)